Google review eligibility route

This reviewer was
never a customer.

A missing customer record can be relevant, but it is not enough on its own. We help turn a genuine concern into a truthful, policy-led case record.

THE CORE QUESTION

Can the review be connected to a genuine customer interaction?

A reviewer may use a different display name or leave incomplete information. The goal is not to assert “fake” too quickly; it is to document the context accurately.

Build the right record

Four checks before
calling a review fake.

These checks protect the quality of the case and avoid inaccurate reporting.

01

Read the exact claim

Identify dates, names, products or statements that could link to a real interaction.

02

Search the right records

Check relevant booking, order or contact records without manufacturing a negative result.

03

Look for context

Note duplicate wording, competitor connection or a conflict of interest only where evidence supports it.

04

Choose the route

Assess whether a policy-led dispute, response, monitoring or no action is appropriate.

Do

Preserve facts.

  • Save the review URL and date
  • Keep a neutral record search summary
  • Share only relevant customer context
  • Use a calm public response if needed

Do not

Manufacture a case.

  • Do not create false customer records
  • Do not send automated mass reports
  • Do not claim a reviewer is fake without basis
  • Do not threaten a genuine reviewer

Start with the public link

Check the review
before you react.

The free eligibility check gives you a structured first record without filing a report automatically.

Check a Google review